Selection process
Learn how applications are evaluated, from academic review to final selection and interview.
How applications are assessed ?
Applications are evaluated through a multi-step selection process involving academic review, shortlisting and interview. Each application is carefully assessed by members of the Academic and Management Board using transparent and structured criteria.
Step 1 – Application Evaluation
Each eligible application is first pre-evaluated by two members of the Academic and Management Board, based on the following weighted criteria:
| Criteria | Weight |
|---|---|
| Recognition of home institution / first degree | 10% |
| Rank / grade / distinction | 20% |
| Adequacy of academic background | 20% |
| Research / professional / international experience | 20% |
| Recommendation letters | 10% |
| Motivation (cover letter) | 20% |
| English proficiency | Pass / Fail |
Applications are scored on a scale from 0 to 5 (5 = Excellent, 0 = Insufficient). Special attention is given to ensure consistency across evaluators.
Step 2 – Shortlisting and Interview
Top applications (score ≥ 3.5/5) are reviewed by the consortium partners and evaluated again by two independent reviewers using the same criteria and weighting system.
Shortlisted applicants are invited to an online interview and evaluated on a scale from 0 to 5.
| Criteria | Weight |
|---|---|
| Understanding and clarity of answers | 10% |
| Ability to illustrate skills with real experiences | 20% |
| Consistency between background and goals | 20% |
| Knowledge of the programme | 20% |
| Level of motivation and engagement | 30% |
| English proficiency | Pass / Fail |
Final selection
Final decisions are made by the Academic Board and agreed by full consensus between all partner universities.
An administrative verification is then conducted (diploma authenticity, references).
Tips for a successful application
Before applying
- Take time to understand the RADMEP+ programme
- Read the selection criteria carefully
During the interview
- Be confident and clear
- Ask for clarification if needed
- Keep answers concise and relevant
- Use real-life examples
- Be proactive and engage in discussion
- Explain your motivation and career goals
Appeal Procedure
Unsuccessful applicants may appeal the selection decision under specific conditions. Appeals must be based on new elements or information that were not considered during the initial evaluation.
- The appeal must be submitted in writing (PDF format)
- It must be sent within 30 days after results publication
- Appeals must include new information not previously considered
- Incomplete or late appeals may be rejected
Appeals should be addressed to:
-> Prof. Sylvain Girard (Academic Coordinator)
master.RADMEP@univ-st-etienne.fr
The Academic and Management Board reviews all appeals and communicates decisions within 30 days.
Disclaimer
Co-funded by the European Union. Views and opinions expressed are however those of the author(s) only and do not necessarily reflect those of the European Union or the European Education and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA). Neither the European Union nor EACEA can be held responsible for them.